← Back to News
Technical 24th March 2026

Full Port vs Reduced Port Ball Valve: Flow, Pressure Drop & Cost Comparison

Key Takeaway

A full port ball valve has a bore diameter matching the pipe ID, delivering near-zero flow restriction and 30–50% higher Cv than a reduced port design. A reduced port valve uses a bore one or two sizes smaller than the pipe, costing 15–30% less. Choose based on your system's pressure drop tolerance, Cv requirements, and budget.

Full Port Bore = Pipe ID (25.4mm for 1") Cv = 60 | Near-zero pressure drop Reduced Port Bore = Pipe ID - 1 size (19mm for 1") Cv = 30 | +100% pressure drop 1" Ball Valve Comparison (ASME B16.34)

What Is a Full Port Ball Valve?

A full port (also called "full bore") ball valve has a ball bore diameter equal to the nominal pipe ID. For example, a 1-inch full port valve has a ~25.4mm bore that matches a Schedule 40 pipe. When fully open, the fluid passes through with virtually no pressure drop. Per API 608 and ISO 17292, full port valves must achieve a Cv at least 90% of the theoretical maximum pipe flow.

Best applications: Pipeline pigging, high-viscosity fluids, systems requiring maximum flow (e.g., data center CDU main loops).

What Is a Reduced Port Ball Valve?

A reduced port ball valve has a bore one nominal size smaller than the pipe. For example, a 1-inch reduced port valve has a ~19mm bore (equivalent to a 3/4" pipe). The fluid accelerates through the constriction, creating additional pressure drop.

Best applications: Branch lines, low-flow systems, cost-sensitive bulk orders (e.g., HVAC branch piping).

How Do Cv Values Compare Between Full Port and Reduced Port?

Valve Size Full Port Cv Reduced Port Cv Cv Difference Pressure Drop Impact
1/2" 18 8 -56% +125%
3/4" 34 17 -50% +100%
1" 60 30 -50% +100%
1-1/2" 130 70 -46% +86%
2" 220 120 -45% +83%

Data based on ASME B16.34 standards and LINS Valve product testing.

Which Should You Choose for Data Center Liquid Cooling?

For AI data center CDU (Coolant Distribution Unit) systems, LINS Valve recommends:

Location in System Recommended Port Reason
Main Loop Full Port Unrestricted glycol-water coolant flow for maximum heat dissipation
CDU Isolation Valves Full Port 3PC Maintenance access without system shutdown
Branch Lines Reduced Port Lower flow requirements, cost savings
Server Rack Supply/Return Reduced Port Adequate flow for individual rack cooling
Bypass Lines Full Port Must handle full system flow during maintenance
CDU System — Valve Port Selection Guide CDU Unit Coolant Distribution Unit FULL PORT FULL PORT RP RP RP RP Rack 1 Rack 2 Rack 3 Rack 4 Full Port — Main Loop (max flow) Reduced Port — Branch Lines (cost saving)

Frequently Asked Questions

Can full port ball valves be used for pipeline pigging?
Yes. Full port is required for pigging operations because the pig must pass through the valve unobstructed. Reduced port valves block pig passage due to the smaller bore.
Does a reduced port valve affect system efficiency?
It depends on the system. In low-velocity systems (e.g., HVAC branches), the added pressure drop is negligible. In high-velocity or pressure-sensitive systems (e.g., chemical processing), full port is preferred.
What sizes does LINS Valve offer in full port?
LINS Valve manufactures full port SS316 ball valves from 1/4" to 4", available in NPT, BSP, Socket Weld, and flanged connections. Certifications include ISO 9001:2015, CSA, and WRAS.